Dec 022010
 

I didn’t seriously start weight training until I was in college, but if I had known this, I would’ve worked out more in my gym class starting in junior high school.  According to this article, resistance training at an early age helps with physical development, improves health, and helps to make kids stronger and more resistant to injury if playing sports.  This is one of those smack-yourself-on-your-forehead type of news that makes you think “no kidding!”  But what shocked me was that, again, according to the article, there is a myth out there that if you do weight training when you are young, it stunts your growth.

Seriously, people think this?

I had never heard of this myth, but I guess it exists, but now we have a scientific study that supports what people have known for a long, long time.  Kids who do physical exercises are healthier and stronger.

Well, what is interesting from this article is that kids don’t grow “bigger” (read: buffer) if they do weight training, but that they develop the ability to recruit more muscles to do the same activity.  In essence, they make the communication pathway between the nerves system and the musculoskeletal system.  This is basically the “grease the groove” concept that a lot of strength trainers have advocated for many years.  Take a read of Pavel Tsatsouline’s article here – it’s one of the best I’ve found that explains this concept.  This greasing of the groove works a little bit differently for adults, but it’s good to know that we can help our kids develop their bodies like this if we can get them started early enough.  Again, according to the NY Times article, the ages of 7-12 is important.  But it’s never too late to start.

Share
 Posted by on December 2, 2010
Dec 022010
 

I am not a native English speaker.  Technically speaking, English is my second language and the language of my birth is Korean.  When I first came to the US, I spent a great deal of time and effort learning to speak, read, and write the language – so much so that now in my head, I think in English, so I guess you can call it the language of my thoughts.  During these early years, I spent a great deal of time just copying books – learning to write in a script that I had vaguely learned in kindergarten in Korea,  but now would become the centerpiece of everything I write.  Part of this practice was spent in developing my penmanship.  I actually spent a good deal of time learning penmanship.  This is probably something anyone learning English as a second language probably went through at some point or another, and I used to use template books with pages similar to that featured above to perfect my handwriting.  And it helped.  I also remember specific handwriting exercises given out as homework by our first and second grade teachers that made us do the same thing I was doing at home just trying to learn the language.  I think (and I’m dating myself here) back in the early 80’s, it was still considered important enough of a subject that it was taught in school.

It doesn’t seem like so anymore.

I have friends with kids who go to elementary school now and rarely are there classes, lessons, or even teachers who instruct in penmanship.  Penmanship is probably a subject matter that probably gets crowded out by more “relevant subjects” for the 21st century, like computer literacy and the internet.  But handwriting is actually, in my humble opinion, an art form, something that can help center your thoughts and something that’s beautiful in and of itself.  And it seems like there’s actually neurologically beneficial reasons for practicing penmanship and handwriting in general.  According to this article, kids who write more by hand seem to develop their neural activity more and can (one hopes) lead the kids developing their intelligence more than those who do not write by hand as much.  Incidentally, this loss of penmanship is not an American phenomenon.  In China, too, there is an increasing loss of handwriting capability as more and more people use texting and keyboard type devices to communicate.  And this is the culture that invented calligraphy, where the entire point of the art is the penmanship.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m no Luddite bemoaning the rise of computers and mobile telecom devices.  But what I am saying is that there are some fundamental skills that can get loss in the shuffle to educate ourselves – and out children – to prepare for the more technologically advanced century.  Certain things are fundamental because they are so important to personal development.  Take a look at letters from the Colonial period, or even the Civil War, or heck, even as recent as WW2.  We often talk about the loss of good, classical education (you know, the kind where you weren’t considered educated until you can speak Latin and Greek, and have read everything from Plato to Dickens, etc).  The handwriting of old display a sense of sophistication and class, at least to us, that to them, was probably as common as writing down a grocery list.  And now there’s scientific evidence that some of these older styles of instructions are actually proven to be beneficial.

Well, Junior, I know by the time you go to school it’ll be the mid 2010s, and you’ll probably have neural interfaces to computers by the time you can vote, but if I have anything to say about, you’re going to learn to write well, not just in content but also in physical form.  I think the model to aspire to is Thomas Jefferson.  He was chosen to be scribe of the Declaration of Independence not just because he was a great wordsmith, but he could actually write in a beautiful handwriting.

Share
 Posted by on December 2, 2010